Collaborative robotic arms from JAKA Robotics (left) and Common Robots.
Get the popcorn prepared. The patent struggle between Teradyne Robotics and JAKA Robotics has became a full-blown public brawl.
Teradyne, mother or father firm of Common Robots, final week sued JAKA’s German subsidiary, alleging infringement of patents overlaying {hardware} and software program utilized in its cobot arms. At present, JAKA hit again, saying it has gone to court docket in search of injunctive aid over what it calls Teradyne’s “false, deceptive, and damaging” public statements in regards to the lawsuit.
JAKA despatched a prolonged press launch to The Robotic Report, which you’ll be able to learn on the backside of this text. The corporate asserted that it acquired no direct communication from Teradyne Robotics or its authorized representatives in regards to the alleged infringement.
As well as, JAKA stated it has not seen any authorized paperwork or court docket notices associated to the case. The Shanghai, China-based company stated it discovered of the allegations solely by means of Teradyne Robotics’ social media announcement and subsequent press inquiries.
JAKA stated its authorized advisers discovered that, as of Sept. 2, no patent-infringement proceedings had been filed or opened in opposition to the corporate. At press time, The Robotic Report had not discovered any court docket paperwork associated to a case between the 2 firms.
JAKA pushed again on the substance of Teradyne Robotics’ allegations. The corporate stated that it develops its personal expertise by means of years of unbiased R&D, holds greater than 300 granted patents worldwide, and commissioned two unbiased freedom-to-operate analyses earlier than getting into the European market. JAKA stated neither evaluation flagged any infringement considerations.
JAKA additionally took intention at Teradyne’s solutions that its merchandise are lower-quality or much less secure, characterizing these statements as tied to “the corporate’s Chinese language origin” and calling them unsubstantiated. JAKA argued that collaborative robotic security depends upon the total utility, together with its design, integration, configuration, and danger evaluation, relatively than the producer’s nation of origin.
The corporate characterised Teradyne Robotics’ public statements as an try to create “anti-competitive uncertainty” available in the market.
Register now and save in your cross to RoboBusiness 2026Teradyne responds
The Robotic Report reached out to Teradyne Robotics for touch upon JAKA’s response. Right here is the total response from David Brandt, vp of analysis and growth and chief expertise officer at Common Robots:
“I can guarantee you that we’ve filed the case with the courts in Copenhagen. If [it] has not but been served to JAKA, it might be because of the time required by the courts, however they need to obtain it shortly.
“Relating to their freedom-to-operate evaluation, they’ve apparently not accomplished an excellent job in the event that they didn’t determine our patents. We additionally discover the variety of patents JAKA claims to carry irrelevant to this case. This matter considerations their infringement of our patents. Moreover, the variety of patents is usually irrelevant, as it’s not in regards to the amount of patents however the power of the patents.
“In relation to their statements about authorized motion in Germany, we await additional data, however we aren’t involved. We now have each proper to defend our mental property and can proceed to take action.”
The Robotic Report will proceed to watch the proceedings and replace this story as extra court docket filings and statements from the businesses change into obtainable.
JAKA Robotics’ full assertion
Beneath is the total assertion JAKA Robotics despatched to The Robotic Report on Sept. 3:
JAKA Robotics right now introduced that it has initiated authorized motion in response to the general public allegations made by Teradyne Robotics concerning alleged patent infringement and additional public statements regarding JAKA’s merchandise and expertise.
With this step, JAKA is taking measures to guard its status, reliable enterprise pursuits and the belief of its prospects, companions and system integrators.
JAKA Robotics takes mental property rights significantly and respects honest competitors. On the similar time, the corporate believes that severe allegations of patent infringement should be addressed on the premise of verifiable information and thru the suitable authorized course of – relatively than by means of public claims that may create anti-competitive uncertainty available in the market.
JAKA takes authorized motion following public allegations
JAKA’s choice to provoke authorized proceedings follows the general public announcement by Teradyne Robotics regarding alleged patent infringement.
As said in JAKA’s preliminary assertion on August 28, 2026, the corporate acquired no communication from Teradyne concerning the alleged patent infringement, both immediately or by means of its authorized representatives. JAKA had likewise not acquired any authorized paperwork, court docket notification or different formal communication regarding the alleged proceedings. JAKA due to this fact grew to become conscious of the allegations solely by means of Teradyne Robotics’ public announcement on social media and subsequent media inquiries.
JAKA has since continued to evaluation the matter with its authorized advisers and has now determined to take acceptable authorized motion to guard its status and legit enterprise pursuits.
The corporate is taking authorized motion in search of injunctive aid to guard its status and enterprise pursuits and to hunt an finish to the continued public dissemination of statements that the corporate considers false, deceptive and damaging.
As of 02.09.2026, no court docket proceedings regarding the alleged patent infringement have been filed or opened in opposition to JAKA. JAKA’s authorized advisers have verified the standing of the matter by means of the related court docket system. This stays the case regardless of Teradyne Robotics having publicly introduced final week that it had filed a lawsuit.
JAKA rejects allegations of illegal copying
JAKA Robotics rejects any public characterization suggesting that the corporate has unlawfully copied Common Robots’ expertise or merchandise.
JAKA develops and engineers its personal merchandise and applied sciences and has invested for a few years in unbiased analysis and growth. The corporate has established its personal engineering, software program and product-development capabilities and continues to develop its robotics portfolio for purchasers throughout Europe and different worldwide markets. It at present holds greater than 300 granted patents worldwide.
Earlier than getting into the European market, JAKA commissioned two unbiased exterior Freedom-to-Function (FTO) analyses. Neither evaluation recognized potential patent infringement related to JAKA’s actions in the marketplace.
The existence of a patent allegation doesn’t set up that infringement has occurred. It seems to JAKA that Teradyne is intentionally in search of to create anti-competitive uncertainty amongst market members with a purpose to hurt its rivals. JAKA is taking authorized motion to counter this.
JAKA rejects unsubstantiated claims concerning product high quality and security
JAKA Robotics additionally rejects public statements by Teradyne Robotics that query the standard or security of JAKA’s merchandise with out offering factual proof to assist such claims.
Statements suggesting that JAKA merchandise are of decrease high quality or that JAKA’s collaborative robots are much less secure merely due to the corporate’s Chinese language origin are deceptive, unsubstantiated and damaging to JAKA’s status.
Like different world robotics producers, JAKA operates inside a global provide chain and works with established suppliers whereas making use of its personal engineering, manufacturing and quality-control processes.
Likewise, the security of a collaborative robotic should be assessed within the context of the whole utility, together with its design, integration, configuration, working circumstances and danger evaluation. JAKA’s collaborative robots are designed to allow secure collaborative functions when correctly built-in and operated in accordance with relevant security necessities.
JAKA considers the general public dissemination of unsubstantiated and disparaging claims a few competitor’s merchandise to be unacceptable enterprise conduct. Such statements can create a deceptive impression amongst prospects, companions and the broader market and might unfairly harm an organization’s status.
Dedication to prospects and companions stays unchanged
JAKA Robotics stays totally dedicated to its prospects, companions and system integrators in Europe. The corporate continues its enterprise operations, buyer assist, product growth and industrial actions as regular.
JAKA believes that prospects and enterprise companions ought to be capable to make selections based mostly on dependable data relatively than unsubstantiated conclusions arising from public allegations.
JAKA Robotics will proceed to supply additional data as acceptable, whereas respecting the continuing authorized course of.
The submit JAKA hits Teradyne Robotics again over patent dispute appeared first on The Robotic Report.
